.png){kind=spacer}
DELIVERY OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE (F.S. § 893.13(1)(a)1); COMMIT 2ND DEGREE FELONY WITH WEAPON (F.S. § 775.087(1)(b))
CASE DISMISSED (NOLLE PROSEQUI)
Escambia County, FL
9 de marzo de 2026
Client faced Delivery of a Controlled Substance (F.S. § 893.13(1)(a)1), a second-degree felony carrying up to 15 years in Florida State Prison and up to a $10,000 fine, along with a weapons enhancement under F.S. § 775.087(1)(b) that would have imposed mandatory minimum sentencing under Florida's 10-20-Life statute. The combined charges represented the most severe category of drug prosecution in Escambia County — the weapons enhancement alone would have required the court to impose a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment with no judicial discretion to deviate. The arrest arose from a [REDACTED] investigation during which law enforcement alleged [REDACTED] delivery of a Schedule I controlled substance while in possession of a [REDACTED] firearm. The client — a [REDACTED] individual with [REDACTED] — faced the near-certainty of years in state prison, a permanent felony record with a drug delivery conviction, and the devastating collateral consequences that flow from a felony drug conviction in Florida, including loss of voting rights, ineligibility for public housing, and permanent damage to employment prospects.
The defense team launched an aggressive pretrial campaign targeting every element of the State's case. At arraignment, we successfully challenged the weapons enhancement charge, resulting in the immediate dismissal of the 10-20-Life enhancement — eliminating the mandatory minimum prison sentence. With the mandatory minimum removed, we turned our attention to dismantling the underlying drug delivery charge through sustained pretrial litigation. We conducted [REDACTED] depositions of key witnesses, filed comprehensive discovery challenges, and prepared detailed motions attacking the [REDACTED] basis for the search and the State's ability to prove the delivery element beyond a reasonable doubt. Through months of aggressive advocacy — including preparation of a Motion to Dismiss that highlighted critical evidentiary gaps — we forced the prosecution to reassess the viability of their case. The State ultimately filed a Nolle Prosequi, completely dismissing all remaining charges. The client went from facing mandatory prison time to walking away with no conviction, no probation, and a clean record. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes; each case depends on its facts and circumstances.