★★★★★
5.0 · 116+ Google Reviews
"Absolutely amazing! We had a difficult case and won!" — Adrianne
Read Reviews →
top of page

DOMESTIC BATTERY — TOUCH OR STRIKE (F.S. 784.03(1)(a)1)

12 MO PTD, NOLLE PROSEQUI

Santa Rosa County, FL

11 de abril de 2025

This matter began with a family disturbance on December 27, 2024, at an apartment complex along Gulf Breeze Parkway in Santa Rosa County. Santa Rosa deputies — including LE Deputy Nicholas Palm Pruse (reporting officer), LE Sgt. Alvin Bicasan, and LE Deputy J. Younghansé — responded after a call for a domestic disturbance. The on-scene report documents an altercation inside a residence, EMS treatment for a seizure observed at the scene, and visible injuries consistent with a physical confrontation. Based on witness statements and the deputies’ observations, a warrant affidavit was submitted and the defendant was charged with domestic-violence battery (touch or strike). Domestic battery charged under F.S. § 784.03(1)(a)1 is typically prosecuted as a first-degree misdemeanor, carrying up to 1 year in county jail and up to a $1,000 fine. When the conduct is prosecuted under a domestic-violence theory it also triggers immediate collateral consequences — no-contact conditions, possible civil injunctions, and long-term harms to employment, housing, and reputation even where jail time is not imposed.

From intake we treated the file as a trial-level matter. Our team preserved and reviewed body-worn video and EMS/provider notes, obtained the deputies’ narrative and witness statements, and developed a factual record focused on context, medical factors, and inconsistencies in the initial allegations. We vigorously tested the State’s proof on identity, timing, and force, while assembling mitigation that explained family dynamics and medical circumstances observed at the scene (including the seizure/medical response). Importantly, we signaled — consistently and publicly — that the defense was fully prepared to try the case rather than accept a weak negotiated outcome.

Resolution:
Although the defense was prepared to take the matter through a full jury trial if necessary, the client elected Pretrial Diversion (PTD) as the path to resolution. After the client completed the PTD requirements, the State filed a Nolle Prosequi and the case was dismissed. That outcome avoided a criminal conviction, the statutory penalties noted above, and the significant collateral consequences that flow from a domestic-violence battery adjudication.

Why this matters:
This result demonstrates the effect of pairing rigorous, trial-level readiness with a realistic, client-centered resolution plan: by preparing to litigate every element we preserved leverage at the negotiating table, allowing the client to choose a diversionary pathway that ultimately led to dismissal and protection of future opportunities.

ARREST REPORT MERRICKS

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. This summary is general information, not legal advice.

logo

Contáctanos

Oficina

240 Calle Intendencia Este

Pensacola, FL 32502

Aviso legal: La información obtenida en este sitio no crea una relación abogado-cliente y no debe considerarse asesoramiento legal. Debe consultar primero con un abogado para analizar su situación específica. No nos envíe información confidencial hasta que haya hablado con uno de nuestros abogados y se haya establecido una relación abogado-cliente. Si proporciona su número de teléfono a través de nuestro formulario de contacto, acepta recibir comunicaciones por SMS de nuestro bufete sobre su caso. Pueden aplicarse tarifas de mensajes y datos. Responda STOP para cancelar la suscripción a los mensajes de texto en cualquier momento. Su número de teléfono solo se utilizará para comunicaciones relacionadas con su caso y no se compartirá con terceros. No dude en contactar con nuestro bufete si tiene alguna pregunta.

bottom of page
RESULTS
★★★★★

5.0 on Google

116 verified client reviews

R
Robert Smith
★★★★★
May 2026

The attorney knew exactly how to proceed with my son's case. I was very impressed by how quickly his charge was dismissed. I would not hesitate to refer anyone I know who needs help from this attorney.

V
Venise C.
★★★★★
May 2026

Trust that you will make the right choice with the Mitkevicius Law Firm. The team follows up promptly and my case was resolved expeditiously. Number one law firm in my opinion. Thank you.

E
Elizabeth Chandler
★★★★★
Mar 2026

If I could, I'd give more stars. The entire group at Mitkevicius Law was on top of things from beginning to end. Even after my daughter's cases were dismissed, they remained available to answer questions. They fought tirelessly for my daughter. They truly care.

R
Rain Coleman
★★★★★
Mar 2026

From first appearance to case dismissal, the entire Mitkevicius team was timely, responsive, compassionate, and professional. They communicated well and explained each step so I never felt lost. Joe and his team advocated strongly on my behalf to ensure a positive outcome.

C
Cecilia Betancourt
★★★★★
Feb 2026

From our first meeting they demonstrated expertise, strategic thinking, and dedication that immediately gave me confidence. I want to extend special thanks to Ms. Viviana Vethencourt for her incredible support throughout the process.

See all 116 reviews on Google →
5.0★★★★★116 reviews